American exceptionalism as exemplified by US international lawlessness

Interview with UK MP George Galloway – Published on Russia Today RT, Oct 5, 2013.

Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa equated US ideas of its own exceptionalism to Nazi ideals of a superior race this week. While a strong statement, no country can invade, occupy and rule with exceptional lawlessness, UK MP George Galloway told RT.

RT: President Correa made some harsh comments regarding US ‘exceptionalism’. What’s your view of this idea that America is ‘exceptional’.   

  • GG: Well, I wouldn’t first of all compare it to the Nazis – nothing is comparable to the Nazis. But it is a dangerous idea that one country is God-given -on top and greater than the others – that cannot be true. I once had an experience on an American radio show in Seattle, where the presenter introduced the item by describing his own country as the greatest country on God’s green earth – so I challenged that immediately. That implies, therefore, I said, that other countries on god’s green earth are less than you. And I’m certainly not going to accept that, and I don’t think that people in other lands would either. But if it was just rhetoric, it wouldn’t matter so much. If it was just vainglory. But it’s put into practice by the international lawlessness of the US which draws on this idea of exceptionalism, and when President Putin challenged that in his US newspaper statement, the Americans were greatly offended. And yet a moment’s contemplation would tell them that no one in the world will accept that any one country can arrogate to itself the right internationally to break any law, invade any country, occupy any land, change any regime, on its own personal whim. That’s just not acceptable but it’s been the practice in the last 60 years – 70 years, nearly – when the US has invaded more than 50 countries. Fifty countries have been subject to American exceptionalism in action.

RT: But you do wonder – is that not the role of the world’s superpower? After all, that’s how it’s seen by so many people, and it has a moral duty to intervene – that’s how it sees itself.

  • GG: Well, these are two separate questions. Morality and the possession of a large stockpile of thousands of nuclear weapons are not the same thing, not synonymous in any way. In any case, the US is not the only superpower in the world: Russia is a superpower, China is a superpower, other countries will soon be superpowers, and they cannot arrogate to themselves the moral right to police and adjudicate the world either, and I don’t believe that the others will want to. What we have to strive for is a world that is government by morality, and the only adjudicator of world morality can be the world body itself – the UN. But a very different UN to the one that we currently have: A democratically constituted one, where power is shared and where no country has a veto on the actions of the security council.

RT: Well, you’re there in London, and many countries – including of course the UK (particularly the UK) – really do propagate this image of US exceptionalism. Why is that? They clearly assume there is some substance in it … //

… (full interview text).

Links:

The Page ST. PETERSBURG INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC FORUM 2012, on Russia Today RT;

The Page Op-Edge on Russia Today RT; http://rt.com/op-edge/

Intel union: Spy agency heads won’t roll with US and UK allied, on Russia Today RT, Oct 5, 2013;

US forces target al-Shabaab leader in Somalia, seize Al-Qaeda leader in Libya, on Russia Today RT, Oct 5, 2013;

(see also: Welcome to our new blog: politics for the 99%).

Comments are closed.